| Title |
Experimental Study on the Performance Improvement of Velcro Reinforcement through Internal Filling |
| Authors |
정영석(Jeong, Yeong-Seok) ; 권민호(Kwon, Minho) ; 김진섭(Kim, Jin-Sup) ; 남광식(Nam, Gwang-Sik) |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2021.41.4.0347 |
| Keywords |
벨크로; 단기둥; 내진보강; 연성보강; 내부충진 Velcro; Single column; Seismic retrofit; Ductility improve; Internal filling |
| Abstract |
During the earthquake, for multi-story structure, if the first floor is soft, the deformation will concentrate on that floor causing a serious damage to the column members which might leads to the collapse of the whole structure like Piloti structure during the Pohang earthquake in Korea. According to the 2016 National Disaster Management Research Institute's “Investigation of Seismic Reinforcement and Cost Analysis of Domestic Non-seismic Buildings”, the rate of seismic resistance of private reinforced concrete buildings was 38.3 %. Among them, it was reported that the seismic-resistance ratio of the two to five-story structures was less than 50
%. Accordingly, the government is trying to improve the seismic rate through support projects, but the conventional seismic reinforcement methods are still expensive, and emergency construction is difficult. Therefore, in this study, the field applicability was evaluated by improving the reinforcement method using Velcro, which was developed through the research project of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs in 2014. In order to improve the performance of the Velcro reinforcement method, introducing the initial tension of Velcro using high foaming rigid urethane filling between the Velcro and concrete of the columns was applied.
Additionally, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the ductility of Velcro specimen from the concrete confinement effect. As a result, the ductility of the Velcro specimen was improved compare to Normal specimen. However, the energy dissipation capacity of VELCRO2 is better than VELCRO1, yet the maximum ductility of those two specimens did not show a significant difference.
Therefore, the improvement of the internal filler material is still needed to have a better maximum ductility. |