All Issue

2021 Vol.41, Issue 5 Preview Page

Construction Management

October 2021. pp. 591-599
Abstract
References
1
Ahn, J. W., Cho, J. H. and Lee, S. H. (2017). Strengthening public- private partnership for infrastructure asset management, Korea Research Institute of Human Settlements, KRIHS (in Korean).
2
Ahn, K. W., Oh, J. H., Park, J. H., Woo, S. G., Park, J. S., Kim J. I., Jang, I. S. and Madanat, S. (2013). The new transport SOC strategies and policies in response to changes in socio-economic circumstances: Development of SOC monitoring indicators and adoption of deteriorated infrastructure management system, The Korea Transport Institute, KOTI, 2013-22 (in Korean).
3
Cevallos, F. (2016). State of good repair performance measures: Assessing asset condition, age, and performance data, U.S. National Center for Transit Research. 10.5038/CUTR-NCTR-RR-2016-09
4
Chin, K. H., Lee, Y. H., Jung, I. S. and Kim, Y. H. (2017). A study on establishment of medium and long-term improvement investment plan of aging national railway facilities, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, KICT (in Korean).
5
Cho, D. Y., Jung, H. S. and Gong, J. H. (2018). Research on infrastructure maintenance systems in major overseas countries, National Assembly Research Service, NARS (in Korean).
6
Cho, J. Y. (2017). Strategies and policy implications for responding to old infrastructure in Japan, Korea Research Institute for Construction Policy, RICON, Construction Policy Review, 2017- 11 (in Korean).
7
Cho, T. H., Lee, B. C. and Do, K. T. (2012). ";A study on the estimation of useful life for individual asset."; National Account Review, Bank of Korea, Vol. 2012. No. 1. pp. 1-46 (in Korean).
8
Cohen, H. S. and Barr, J. (2012). ";State of good repair: Prioritizing the rehabilitation and replacement of existing capital assets and evaluating the implications for transit."; U.S. Transportation Research Board, Vol. 157.
9
Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT) (2015). Road maintenance in japan: problems and solutions, Available at: https://www.mlit.go.jp/road/road_e/s3_ maintenance.html (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
10
Jung, D. S., Ahn, G. K., Kim, C. Y., Park, S. H., Kim, J. H., Shin, B. G. and Yang, H. M. (2016). Establishment of research foundation for longevity of bridges in public service through performance evaluation of aged (demolishing) bridge, Korea Construction Engineering Development Collaboratory Management Institute, KOCED (in Korean).
11
Kim, J. Y., Cho, J. S. and Lee, J. H. (2015). Investment paradigm and policy corresponding to transport infrastructure deterioration, The Korea Transport Institute, KOTI, MP-15-07 (in Korean).
12
Korea Appraisal Board (KAB) (2013). List of useful life of tangible fixed assets. Available at: http://www.kab.co.kr/kab/home/main/ main.jsp (Accessed: November 16, 2020) (in Korean).
13
Korea Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) (2011). Asset revaluation accounting guidelines (in Korean).
14
Korea Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2019). Comprehensive countermeasures to strengthen safety for sustainable infrastructure (in Korean).
15
Lee, S. W., Kim, J. J., Uhm, K. Y. and Kim, S. H. (2019). The necessity of expanding investment in old infrastructure and policy measures, Construction and Economy Research Institute of Korea, CERIK (in Korean).
16
Park, K. T., Park, H. S., Lee, J. S., Yoo, Y. J., Lee, Y. H., Seo, D. W., Kim, B. C., Min, J, Y., Na, W. K., Park, J. S., Jung, G. S., Kim, G. Y. and Lee, S. H. (2018). Development of mid·long term data based standardized platform and service technology for aging infrastructure maintenance, Korea Institute of Construction Technology, KICT (in Korean).
17
Tamakoshi, T., Shirato, M., Yokoi, Y., Mabuchi, T. and Yabu, M. (2014). Guidelines for periodic road structure inspections, Japan National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management (NILIM). Available at: http://www.nilim.go.jp/english/annual/ annual2015/pdf_file/43.pdf (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
18
U.K. Highways England (2020). Highway England operational metrics manual, Available at: https://highwaysengland.co.uk/ publications/ (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
19
U.K. Ministry of Defense (MOD) (2009). UK railways permanent way design and maintenance policy and standards.
20
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) (2008). Railroad track maintenance and safety standards.
21
U.S. Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) (2016). Benefit-cost analysis guidance for rail projects.
22
U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (2016). Transit asset management final rule, Available at: https://www.transit.dot.gov/ sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/Transit%20Asset%20Management%20Final%20Rule.pdf (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
23
U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (2017). Transit asset management final rule fact sheet, Available at: https://www. transit.dot.gov/TAM/rulemaking/finalrulefactsheet (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
24
U.S. Federal Transit Administration (FTA) (2020). Performance measures - Facilities, Available at: https://www.transit.dot.gov/ PerformanceManagement (Accessed: November 16, 2020).
25
U.S. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) (2019). Minnesota transportation asset management plan.
26
U.S. Regional Transporation Authority (RTA) (2016). Capital asset condition 2016 - Year 5 assessment.
27
Yoo, B. K. and Kim, D. Y. (2013). Current state of aging infrastructure and problems, Weekly Economic Review. Hyundai Research Institute (in Korean).
28
Yoon, J. S. (2020). 28% of aged rail infrastructure have passed 40 years or more after construction., Yonhap News, Available at: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20200917052000003?input=1195m (Accessed: Feburary 9, 2021).
Information
  • Publisher :Korean Society of Civil Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :대한토목학회
  • Journal Title :KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH
  • Journal Title(Ko) :대한토목학회 논문집
  • Volume : 41
  • No :5
  • Pages :591-599
  • Received Date :2020. 11. 16
  • Revised Date :2021. 02. 04
  • Accepted Date : 2021. 03. 11